Invisible if css is enabled, don't click
This shouldn't be displaying, if you have css disabled, don't click

Archive for the 'Politics' Category

Jim Prentice and the Conservatives want to make you a criminal

Friday, September 19th, 2008

Since the election is coming up I think it’s important to remind everyone of Bill C-61, the copyright law introduced by M.P. Prentice at the end of the spring. It is a draconian bill meant to appease the American lobby in Canada (CRIA among others.)

Take a look at the following scenarios and see if you’ve ever done something like it.

Scenario 1:

Jim and Josee live in a Calgary suburb together with their three children Stephen (age 16), Rona (age 10), and Diane (age 4). Jim is the chief librarian at the National Energy Library, while Josee teaches media and communications at a local high school.

This post focuses on Jim. Soon after he arrives into the office on Monday morning, he is contacted by a researcher located in the field who asks him to track down an article and to email an electronic copy as soon as possible. Jim finds the article, scans and sends it via email. After work, he drops into the local HMV and purchases a DVD copy of the movie Juno. At home, he transfers a copy of the movie to his video iPod for viewing on an upcoming business trip.

If the Canadian DMCA becomes law, Jim is a criminal.
source: A Week in the Life of The Canadian DMCA: Day 1

Scenario 2:

Rona is a huge American Idol fan, faithfully watching each episode and buying CDs released by former contestants with her savings. Last January, Jim set the family’s PVR to tape and retain each episode to allow Rona to watch how the contestants progressed. That night, Rona records an Internet-only broadcast of American Idol highlights on her personal computer. She also asks her brother Stephen to transfer songs from her newest CD to her computer. The CD is copy-protected, but Stephen uses a circumvention program to transfer the music files.

If the Canadian DMCA becomes law, Jim, Rona and Stephen are criminals.
source: A Week in the Life of The Canadian DMCA: Day 2

Scenario 3:

In the morning, Josee teaches a class on media in the digital world. The class is conducted in a distance-learning classroom and includes both her students and students from a school in Edmonton using Alberta’s SuperNet network. This is the second year that she has run the course and she is using the same lessons, which include extensive copies of articles for course materials. In the afternoon, Josee teaches a communications class, making use of a website that features a copyright and an “all rights reserved” notice. A student in the class presents a research assignment that features short excerpts from a DVD copy of the movie Broadcast News and passages that are cut-and-pasted from an electronic book that contains a digital lock. Josee is a big Calgary Flames fan. The Flames are playing that night with the game broadcast on pay-per-view. Josee has a dinner commitment, but decides to buy the game and record it with her PVR to watch when she gets home.

If the Canadian DMCA becomes law, Josee is a criminal.
source: A Week in the Life of The Canadian DMCA: Day 3

Scenario 4:

Diane, who is four years old, is a huge fan of the popular TV character Dora the Explorer. For her birthday, she received four Dora DVDs. Given Diane’s habit of scratching them, her dad has begun to create backup versions. That day, Diane brings home her kindergarten class photo, which was taken by a local photographer. Josee digitizes the photo and sends a copy to Diane’s grandmother.

If the Canadian DMCA becomes law, Diane is a criminal.
source: A Week in the Life of The Canadian DMCA: Day 4

Scenario 5:

Stephen is a big music fan. Tonight, he is going with his girlfriend to see his favourite band in concert. He has purchased every CD issued by the band. To get ready for concert, he downloads a live version of one of his favourite songs that was released commercially in Europe (it is not available in Canada) that he finds on a file-sharing network. The song is downloaded to an external hard drive that he uses to store his music. While on the network, one hundred songs on the hard drive were available in his shared folder for others to download, though none were. At his girlfriend’s request, he also copies three of the band’s best songs onto a CD to play during the drive to the concert. He gives the CD to his girlfriend as a gift.

If the Canadian DMCA becomes law, Stephen is a criminal.
source: A Week in the Life of The Canadian DMCA: Day 5

All of these scenarios were created by Dr. Michael Geist is a law professor at the University of Ottawa, he’s an expert in Copyright law.


Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Popularity: 18% [?]

How Bill C-61 will change the copyright act.

Tuesday, June 24th, 2008

Minister of Industry Jim Prentice recently introduced the Bill designated C-61 into the house of parliament here in Canada. The bill for every intent and purpose is a clone of the United States’ DMCA with extra draconian clauses tacked on for good measure. Prentice and party are doing their worst best to try and put a good spin on this horrible bill but not too many people are buying it. Both the NDP and Liberal parties have overtly criticised the bill. Copyright experts such as Michael Giest and Howard Knopf have pointed out until they are blue how this bill is wrong, the public spoke out, yet Prentice proceeded anyways. We can only hope his fate is parallel to the last couple folks that tried to push the American agenda.

I’m beginning to rant and that’s not what I want, I started this article to bring to your attention some work done by a fellow named Felix G.; he put together a document showing exactly how the Canadian Copyright Act is going to be affected by this bill should it pass as it currently stands. If you have the time and legalese interest to read it, it’s a very chilling outlook.

If you don’t feel like sorting through the Copyright Act you can also check on the same page linked above, a side-by-side comparison of of Richard Stallman’s Right to Read and the new bill. The scary thing is that almost every prediction of the worst case scenario outlined in Right to Read would come true in.

Popularity: 39% [?]

I was saying Boo-ush

Monday, March 31st, 2008

Watch as President Bush gets booed at the season open of the Washington Nationals. I really don’t have anything more to add to that other than I don’t know whether it’s funny or sad.

Source: HuffingtonPost.com

Technorati Tags: , ,

Popularity: 63% [?]

Canadian version of the DMCA being pushed through

Thursday, December 13th, 2007

Update: Good news, Minister Angus, NDP has updated the Facebook group to advise that Minister Prentice was not present at today’s sitting, he has one more change tomorrow to present the bill before Parliament closes shop for the rest of the year! Minister Angus also advises that they may not even sit tomorrow. So we may have more time to put a stop to this bill and force Minister Prentice to rethink his position. This does not mean we can slack off!

This is a huge issue to me that every Canadian should be concerned about. Minister Prentice is pushing a Bill through parliament that is rumoured to be like the US DMCA on crack. Most people don’t know what the ramifications are of this, I suspect not even our government. The short story is that anything copyrighted you want to use under current fair use is probably going to be illegal. Want to make a copy of that music on your ipod for your car? That’s illegal. Want to use a snippet from a television in your review of the show? That’s illegal. Want to criticise a peice of work? You bet your bottom that’s a illegal.

The new bill the Minister Prentice is introducing is rumoured to have no provisions for fair use. What it enables the various industries (CRIA, MPAA, etc) to do is put digital locks on their software, DRM, and no matter how weak those locks are it is illegal to try and circumvent them. This also means that if you have say an iPod and a year from now you buy a Microsoft Zune and you want to transfer those files over to your new device, you can’t! This is because iTunes uses a proprietary DRM that is incompatible with Microsoft’s DRM. Under the new law you will be required to purchase a new copy of the music you have already bought.

What this is going to enable is coalitions like the CRIA* to litigate as a business model. Like in the United States they will begin suing file sharers for thousands of dollars per song under the guise that it is necessary to punish people for infringing their copyright so excessively that they must essentially declare bankruptcy for illegally downloading a single alubm.

* Note: that the CRIA is mainly comprised of American recording labels, namely EMI, SONY, Warner Music and Universal. It is essentially the Canadian chapter of the RIAA

Find out what you can do after the jump…

(more…)

Popularity: 74% [?]

iTunes Plus

Wednesday, May 30th, 2007

Apple has previewing what their marketing team is calling iTunes Plus. It is their experiment with EMI to provide DRM-free music to consumers. For an extra $0.30 (USD) you can download music from the iTunes store with no DRM and an increased bitrate of 256bps (that’s double of the DRM enabled music.) Anyone that knows anything knows that the $0.30 hike is not because of the extra bitrate they put into it. More likely the added cost is to appease EMI and grab a little extra profit, but to me personally I don’t care.

I don’t know why they call it iTunes Plus, I would have called it iTunes Minus (the CRAP) or iTunes Done Correctly but whatever I’m ok with whatever spin their marketers have to put on it, and it still puts a negative spin on the DRM enabled music. I will actually be purchasing music through the iTunes store now, I refused to beforeDRM.

To access the preview you will need the latest iTunes (v7.2) just open up the iTunes store and there will be a link, it’s hard to miss. It might take you back to your webbrowser and ask you to open up an application (it opens iTunes to the iTunes Plus section of the iTunes store.)

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

Popularity: 95% [?]

We did not invent the algorithm. The algorithm killed Jeeves. The algorithm constantly finds Jesus. This is not the algorithm. This is close.